Nested case control study selection bias

The goal is to select individuals in whom the distribution of exposure status would be the same as that of the cases in the absence of an exposure disease association. However, this is not always possible in practice.

Nested case-control studies quizlet

However, this is not always possible in practice. It is helpful to remember that it seems natural that the population denominator includes people who develop the disease in a cohort study. Obviously, this is a much more efficient design. Common sources of bias in a case-control study 3. If, on the other hand, one is interested in the association between gene expression and breast cancer incidence, it would be very expensive and possibly wasteful of precious blood specimen to assay all 89, women without breast cancer. This phenomenon is known as the rare-disease assumption. With a case-control sampling strategy one simply takes a sample of the population in order to obtain an estimate of the exposure distribution within the population that gave rise to the cases. The difference between sampling from the whole population and only the non-diseased is that the whole population contains people both with and without the disease of interest. As with cohort studies, case-control studies can be prospective or retrospective. Wayne W. The use of prevalent cases may give rise to recall bias as prevalent cases may be less likely to accurately report past exposures s. In case-control studies where cases are hospital based, it is common to recruit controls from the hospital population. Date last modified: June 7, Measuring exposure status Exposure status is measured to assess the presence or level of exposure for each individual for the period of time prior to the onset of the disease or condition under investigation when the exposure would have acted as a causal factor. However, case-control studies, like cohort studies, can be either retrospective or prospective.

The use of prevalent cases may give rise to recall bias as prevalent cases may be less likely to accurately report past exposures s. It is important to note that, unlike cohort studies, case-control studies do not follow subjects through time.

For example, if cases are selected from a defined population such as a GP register, then controls should comprise a sample from the same GP register. Since the covariate is not measured for all participants, the nested case—control model is both less expensive than a full cohort analysis and more efficient than taking a simple random sample from the full cohort.

These include: Standardized questionnaires.

Longitudinal cohort nested case control study

This section introduces you to basic concepts, application and strengths of case-control study. Rothman states that one should look upon all case-control studies as being "nested" within a cohort. Retrospective and Prospective Case-Control Studies Students usually think of case-control studies as being only retrospective, since the investigators enroll subjects who have developed the outcome of interest. However, note that in comparison to the cases, there are so many controls that each particular control contributes relatively little information to the analysis. Epidemiologists generally prefer the prospective approach because it has fewer biases, but it is more expensive and sometimes not possible. Using only the non-diseased to select controls as opposed to the whole population means the denominator is not really a measure of disease frequency, but when the disease is rare, the odds ratio using the non-diseased will be very similar to the estimate obtained when the entire population is used to sample for controls. This is a particular problem associated with case-control studies and therefore needs to be carefully considered during the design and conduct of the study.

However, in retrospective case-control studies, it can be difficult to select from the population at risk, and controls are then selected from those in the population who didn't develop disease. Alternatively, none of the cases might have already occurred, and new cases will be enrolled prospectively.

nested study clinical trials

Controls are used to estimate the prevalence of exposure in the population which gave rise to the cases. Note that in case-control studies the measurement of exposure is established after the development of disease and as a result is prone to both recall and observer bias.

In addition, unless the effect of exposure on duration of illness is known, it will not be possible to determine the extent to which a particular characteristic is related to the prognosis of the disease once it develops rather than to its cause.

Nested case-control studies use subjects drawn from a cohort study

The use of incident cases is considered as preferential, as the recall of past exposure s may be more accurate among newly diagnosed cases. For example, if cases are selected from a defined population such as a GP register, then controls should comprise a sample from the same GP register. However, in retrospective case-control studies, it can be difficult to select from the population at risk, and controls are then selected from those in the population who didn't develop disease. This topic is covered in more detail in EP Intermediate Epidemiology. When case-control studies were first developed, most were conducted retrospectively, and it is sometimes assumed that the rare-disease assumption applies to all case-control studies. As with cohort studies, case-control studies can be prospective or retrospective. However, case-control studies, like cohort studies, can be either retrospective or prospective. Failing to do so, such as by treating the cases and selected controls as the original cohort and performing a logistic regression, which is common, can result in biased estimates whose null distribution is different from what is assumed. In addition, the temporal sequence of exposure and disease is easier to assess among incident cases. The source of controls is dependent on the source of cases. For example, in a case-control study of the association between smoking and lung cancer the inclusion of controls being treated for a condition related to smoking e. Common sources of bias in a case-control study 3. However, it actually only applies to those case-control studies in which controls are sampled only from the non-diseased rather than the whole population. Alternatively, none of the cases might have already occurred, and new cases will be enrolled prospectively. In case-control studies where cases are hospital based, it is common to recruit controls from the hospital population.

Source of cases The source of cases needs to be clearly defined. In order to minimize bias, controls should be selected to be a representative sample of the population which produced the cases.

Rated 10/10 based on 41 review
Download
Introduction to study designs